Speaking at an event titled "Harnessing American Power" last month, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum expressed dismay at what he saw as a new wave of local opposition to data centers in America. What's more, he claimed, not everything was as it seemed. "It's not organic and local, some of this is foreign-sourced dark money," he [told the crowd](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUhViG9-ekc). He isn't alone in his suspicions. Over on the podcast _All-In_, which is hosted by a group of tech multimillionaires who call each other "besties," there was also talk of foreign influence, specifically from China. "It is starting to feel or seem like there might be a CCP-funded campaign," fund manager Gavin Baker told the hosts. The theory that China is paying local activists in America to oppose data centers is catching on like wildfire among the Silicon Valley elite, despite a lack of evidence. Wealthy investors are naming names and pointing fingers, even if they can't directly link their projects' opponents to China. That's not to say that Chinese influence is completely absent from the U.S. conversation around AI infrastructure and data centers. On Wednesday OpenAI said it [banned a cluster of likely Chinese accounts](https://openai.com/index/prc-linked-influence-operations-ai-debates/) that used ChatGPT to generate anti-data center content this past winter. The accounts were probably run by a private Chinese technology firm working for "provincial-level government clients" in China, OpenAI said. The company said the operators posed as Americans on social media and posted AI-generated comments and images highlighting energy demand and rising electricity costs. But OpenAI also said the impact of the influence campaign appeared limited and its social media posts didn't get much traction. "This was not a case of an influence operation creating a debate. The debate existed already. This was an influence operation from China trying to interfere in it. We didn't see any signs that they succeeded," said Ben Nimmo, who leads threat investigations at OpenAI, on a call with reporters. The allegations that some activists are being directly financed by China come amid a [rising wave](https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2026-05-27/nottingham-data-center-proposal-withdrawn-after-backlash) of [anti-data center](https://whyy.org/articles/data-center-artificial-intelligence-vineland-new-jersey/) sentiment: a recent [Gallup poll](https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx) found that 71% of Americans somewhat or strongly opposed construction of data centers in their communities. Despite that [public opposition](https://www.kut.org/energy-environment/2026-02-18/san-marcos-city-council-blocks-proposed-data-center), the theory does appear to be gaining some traction in Washington. In a [letter](https://d1dth6e84htgma.cloudfront.net/2026_06_04_Letter_to_PCAST_and_FBI_on_Foreign_Influence_AI_Data_Centers_99f6aa6cda.pdf) last week, Congressman Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce called for a briefing on whether the U.S. government sees evidence for Chinese influence in the data center debate. The letter was addressed to FBI Director Kash Patel as well as David Sacks and Michael Kratsios, two wealthy tech investors who sit on President Trump's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (Sacks, who was until recently Trump's [special adviser on artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency](https://www.npr.org/2025/12/12/nx-s1-5631823/david-sacks-ai-advisor-investment-conflicts), is also a regular host of _All-In_). ### "Cells" in Utah  Many top earners promoting the foreign influence theory are either directly or indirectly invested in artificial intelligence. One prominent advocate is Canadian multimillionaire and _Shark Tank_ star Kevin O'Leary, who is an investor in a giant data center in Utah called [Stratos](https://thestratosproject.com/). It was going to be roughly twice the size of Manhattan and was being pushed through the permitting process, until local opposition began to build. After a local planning council approved the project in early May, O'Leary noticed an "immediate spike in misinformation," he said during a recent Fox News interview [he posted](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYM526QosnJ/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA%3D%3D) on his own social media account. "We dug in, I got my guys to do a deep dig into the IP addresses and here's what we found, this is fascinating," he said. "We found two cells inside of Utah." O'Leary claimed that a nonprofit called Alliance for a Better Utah and a consultancy known as Elevate Strategies were operating on behalf of the Chinese government against the project, which his company, [O'Leary Digital](https://www.olearydigital.ai/), is leading. He went on to name several current and former employees with both organizations. Among them was Gabi Finlayson, a senior partner at Elevate Strategies, which is based in Salt Lake City and helps Democratic candidates run for office in Utah and elsewhere. She told NPR she had no idea how she or Elevate ended up on O'Leary's list. "I think we have been as confused as anybody," she said. Finlayson said that Elevate, like several progressive groups, had posted about the data center on its social media channels, but the firm is not playing a central role in efforts to stop construction. Moreover, its social media accounts don't generate revenue for the organization. "We are certainly not a Chinese cell. Nobody pays us to make any content, let alone any foreign government," she said. Employees at Alliance for a Better Utah were equally perplexed. "I grew up watching _Shark Tank_ with my dad occasionally, and I was like why is this guy talking about us?" said Elizabeth Hutchings, the organization's communications director. O'Leary named people who didn't even work there anymore, and he claimed "there was evidence that millions of dollars were being funneled from the Chinese Communist Party," Hutchings said. O'Leary did not respond to several NPR requests for comment about the claims. NPR checked Alliance for a Better Utah's tax documents and found they posted revenue of around $200,000 dollars in 2024, which was on par with their annual revenue for the past decade. "You know, it was such an outrageous claim we laughed," Hutchings said. The group even made a [fundraising video](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYOQkmdgU1H/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==) mocking the idea they were funded by China on social media. The video displayed a hammer and sickle while asking for donations from local Utahns. Alliance for a Better Utah has also filed [a lawsuit](https://betterutah.org/mida-lawsuit/) on behalf of five residents of Box Elder County, where Stratos is set to be built. The residents claim they weren't adequately consulted about the project. ### "We haven't found much"  Beyond the limited findings from OpenAI, evidence for a coordinated Chinese campaign to stop data centers in the U.S. remains thin. In mid-May the Bitcoin Policy Institute, a nonprofit primarily devoted to advocating for the crypto industry, published a [report](https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/foreign-influence-in-the-campaign-against-american-ai) claiming "three vectors of influence" behind the anti-AI campaign. The report claimed that Chinese state media, foreign billionaires and alleged Chinese-backed U.S. leftists were working together to stop data center development, but offered little direct evidence that the campaign existed or was having much effect. In an [article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/05/29/shark-tank-kevin-oleary-claims-china-stirred-data-center-protests/) published by the _Washington Post_, several groups named in the report denied any Chinese funding or involvement. Independent researchers say they have so far turned up little evidence of a coordinated Chinese effort. "We haven't found much," says Darren Linvill, the co-lead of the Media Forensics Hub at Clemson University, which tracks foreign influence campaigns online. China, like a lot of countries, controls armies of social media bots that can try to sway the online discourse, but Linvill says they're not talking much about this topic. And, he says, despite claims to the contrary, Chinese state media appears much more intent on promoting Chinese data centers. "China tends to care a lot more about what you think about China and China's economy, than they tend to do about what you think about your neighbor and what's happening in your own backyard here in the United States." Linvill said he can't rule out that the Chinese are quietly paying influencers or others to oppose data centers, but he pointed out there's no need. "I think in this case, the people talking about data centers are real people with real passions and real perspectives and real opinions." In Utah, those people appear to have forced Kevin O'Leary to scale back his plans. After the president of the Utah Senate [raised concerns](https://senate.utah.gov/oleary-concedes-to-president-adams-demands-including-75-reduction-in-proposed-data-center-project-area-and-new-water-for-great-salt-lake/), he agreed to [shrink his data center project](https://www.scribd.com/document/1047108677/KO-Letter-to-President-Adams-6-4-26?v=0.647) to a quarter of its original size. _NPR's Shannon Bond contributed reporting to this story._

183749736 story [](//slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=china) Posted by [BeauHD](https://www.linkedin.com/in/beauhd/) on Thursday June 11, 2026 @11:00AM from the behind-the-scenes dept. An anonymous reader quotes a report from Politico: _China was likely behind an online influence operation to sway U.S. perceptions of artificial intelligence technology and reshape the debate in Washington around the infrastructure needed to support it, according to research from OpenAI [published](https://openai.com/index/prc-linked-influence-operations-ai-debates/) Wednesday. OpenAI said it caught the influence campaign because China-backed operatives were using ChatGPT to create content for the social media campaign. \[...\] OpenAI's researchers identified two clusters of ChatGPT users "likely originating from China" who used the AI chatbot to generate social media content "in support of apparent covert influence operations" promoting certain narratives about AI. This includes claims that data center build-outs are raising electricity costs for the average American family and that President Donald Trump has weaponized tariffs to keep the U.S. ahead in the global tech race. These accounts have since been banned, the report said. One cluster of users asked ChatGPT to generate images and comments pushing these narratives. These comments were then posted on social media by "batches of accounts" posing as Americans, \[said Ben Nimmo, principal investigator of intelligence and investigations at OpenAI\]. Another cluster identified by researchers used AI to generate social media content criticizing the Trump administration's tariffs as an attempt to "dominate technological competition." Prompts used for this campaign were submitted in Simplified Chinese and asked that AI-generated content not include Chinese President Xi Jinping and focus solely on Trump -- a possible tell that China was behind the operation, according to the report. Nimmo said that the influence campaign amplified existing public backlash in the U.S. against the creation of new AI data centers, which has resulted in dozens of proposed moratoriums at the local, state and national level. _"Neither campaign appears to have gained much authentic engagement," Nimmo said. "They're important for what they reveal about the intentions of influence operators from China, and the narratives they're testing and seeking to amplify, but not for the impact."